Present at the meeting were Drs. Marc
Schuckit, Christina Delos Reyes, Karen Drexler, Katie
McQueen, Gail Rose (all second year scholars), and Drs.
Joseph Sakai, Sarah Book, Andrea DiMartini, and Marianne
Fireman (all first year scholars).
The
meeting was chaired by Dr. Marc Schuckit with the help of
Drs. Marianne Guschwan and Susan Tapert, along with the AMSP
Administrator, Marcy Gregg.
Two guests
from UCSD attended, including Bonnie Nagel, Ph.D. and Carmen
Pulido.
I.
Wednesday, March 31st.
The meeting began as participants met
in the lobby of the hotel at 6:45 p.m.
Introductions were made for guests and attending spouses,
and the group proceeded to Sbicca Restaurant for the evening=s
dinner meeting. At that time the
tentative schedule and order of events for the next three
days was discussed. Scholars were
reminded of their need to present their lectures, and
introduced to the room in which the meeting was occurring.
II.
Thursday, April 1st.
We began at 8:00 a.m. over breakfast
by discussing the agenda. The specific
times of presentations, and (for second year scholars) the
abbreviated format or changes in potential audience was
presented.
Marc
Schuckit then gave a demonstration of the lecture on How To
Give a Lecture. The goal here was not so much to
demonstrate the lecture itself (as this had already been
done at the prior meeting), but to ask both junior and
senior scholars how the material might be modified to help
better prepare the new scholars when they arrive in October
2004. Among the suggestions were the
need to emphasize more about when data are appropriate to
use and when not; discuss how the lecture can be expanded
into a data-oriented lecture if needed; spend a bit more
time covering the philosophic underpinnings of the lecture
approach; remind the first-year scholars that they are
developing an outline that can be used by other people
(e.g., imaging that a resident or additional faculty member
has to give one of your own lectures at a time when you are
unexpectedly called out of town); expanding information on
the use of a bibliographic system such as Endnotes; the
importance of seeing the four main points as if they were
Alearning objectives@;
asking first-year scholars to select one or more tentative
topics in the several weeks prior to the meeting; etc.
The
discussion broadened into a review of additional
approaches that might help orient first-year scholars.
Suggestions included advising scholars that if they
are going to take a vacation it is best done before the
meeting, not after. This will increase
the probability that they will be able to use the energy
generated at the meeting to go home and begin implementing
the changes to curricula and working on their lectures.
Additional suggestions were to remind first-year
scholars that the time frame for deadlines goes very
quickly; advise senior scholars to be very proactive in
helping the junior scholars (which resulted in a suggestion
that one of our scholars develop a written guideline to help
senior scholars know what to do); advise junior scholars to
get a rough outline of their topic to Marc before the fall
meeting ends; being certain that the junior scholars know
what the deadlines will be even before they attend their
first meeting; encouraging junior scholars to discuss
potential topics with Marc before the meeting begins; and so
on.
Sarah
Book then presented her lecture on the comorbidity between
substance use disorders and anxiety conditions.
As was true of all of the lectures at this meeting,
this was an excellent presentation that was quite effective.
A number of suggestions were made by the audience to
make this even stronger (with notes taken by the relevant
senior scholar), and Sarah (as well as all other first-year
scholars) was asked to have a finalized copy of her
presentation to Marc to be loaded on the website within six
weeks of the meeting.
The
next item on the agenda was Gail Rose=s
(a senior scholar) report regarding her accomplishments at
the University of Vermont, as well as her future plans.
Gail hopes to remain active in AMSP through
continuing development of several papers based on her
lecture, helping to facilitate an alumni group, and,
perhaps, through hosting an AMSP meeting in Vermont, perhaps
in September of 2005. Gail then
presented her accomplishments over the last six months.
These
have included a noontime lecture on Motivational
Interviewing to about 30 second-year students that was
organized by the Psychiatry Interest Group; an OSCE
(objective structured clinical encounter) workshop at the
Vermont Physicians Conference on Addiction Medicine on
office-based Brief Intervention, featuring a case of a heavy
drinker presenting to his primary care physician=s
office complaining of gastric pain and sleep disturbance,
that was attended by community-based and
academically-affiliated practitioners and medical students
from Vermont and New Hampshire; and serving as an instructor
for the first-year medical interviewing course for which she
advised the director on curriculum material for alcohol use
disorders and motivational interviewing, which constituted
40% of the course content. Gail is
collaborating with Marc Schuckit and alumnae scholar
Margaret Rukstalis on two papers: (1) How to be a mentor;
and (2) Teaching Teachers: The Alcohol Medical Scholars
Program. She is mentoring 8 first-year
students in the Medical Student Leadership Group (meet
weekly for full academic year = 19 sessions), one of whom
has applied to the Betty Ford Summer Institute for Medical
Students. She has been working with a resident and a medical
student to develop a screening site at one of the university=s
family practice clinics for National Alcohol Screening Day.
In the future, she plans to discuss with the
psychiatry residency director her interest in offering a
workshop on lecturing and the use of PowerPoint.
Joseph Sakai of the University of Colorado presented his
accomplishments over the prior six months, along with the
areas in which he hopes to focus in the next six months.
Since October, Joe has attempted to increase
educational activities regarding substance use disorders
within 1) the CU psychiatric residency, 2) the department=s
substance use disorder treatment programs, and 3) CU medical
school.
Psychiatric residency: Dr. Sakai met
with the CU residency training director (Robert House, M.D.)
and reviewed copies of all course syllabi offered throughout
the residency. He noted that most
lectures on substance use disorders (SUD) were given in the
PG III year and that no formal lectures on SUD were given to
the intern class in the current curriculum.
Joe offered to develop a series of lectures (a
Aprimer@
course) on SUD for the current intern class.
Five topic areas were approved by Bob House (1.
assessment, 2. pharmacotherapy and SUD, 3. psychosocial
treatments, 4. opioid agonist treatment, and 5. treatment of
withdrawal) and Joe delivered these lectures for the first
time 1/04-2/04. Reviews were positive
and Dr. Sakai was offered the opportunity to continue giving
this lecture series annually to each incoming intern class.
Because of his involvement with AMSP, Joe was also
approached by Tom Crowley, M.D. to become a lecturer in the
main PG III lecture series on SUD. He
lectured for the first time in this course in 3/04.
Department=s
substance use disorder treatment programs:
Within the division of substance dependence in the CU
department of Psychiatry, ARTS (Addiction Research and
Treatment Services) has a wide range of treatment programs
including: male and female therapeutic communities,
methadone, intensive outpatient, and adolescent outpatient,
day treatment and residential services.
Many clinicians are less familiar with comorbid psychiatric
disorders and the use of medications.
Joe has therefore instituted a series of in-service lectures
for these clinicians.
Medical School:
Joe met with the vice-chair of education (Mike
Weissberg, M.D.) within the department of psychiatry.
Under the vice chair=s
direction he: 1) joined the threads working group (and
proposed including substance use disorders as a thread
within the curriculum, 2) drafted a curriculum on treatment
of SUD for medical students, 3) developed a plan to evaluate
knowledge/skills regarding substance use disorders among the
medical students, and 4) developed a standardized patient
(SP) testing assessment of an alcohol dependent patient
(recently accepted by the clinical skills working group;
this SP will be piloted this spring and will be included in
the third-year medical student clinical skills exam this
summer). Unfortunately the proposed thread on substance use
disorders was not accepted but Mike Weissberg has continued
his support for including a curriculum on substance use
disorders within the second-year human behavior course and
the third-year psychiatry clerkship.
In the
next six months Dr. Sakai will: 1) continue the intern
Amini@
course on substance use disorders, 2) continue to lecture in
Tom Crowley=s
PGIII substance use disorders course, 3) pilot and revise
the standardized patient case for inclusion in the
third-year clinical skills examination this summer, 4)
develop a written exam for third-year medical students
testing knowledge of substance use disorders, and 5) work to
develop a handbook and case-driven lecture series for
medical students on substance use disorders.
Finally,
Joe concluded by discussing his K08 revised application
(submitted 10/03). Because in the
Apink sheets@
for the first submission one reviewer commented on the need
to outline a plan for development as an educator, he
included a new section in the revised application, outlining
activities with AMSP. Dr. Sakai recently
received a priority score of 140 for this revised
application.
The next
order of business was Susan Tapert=s
lecture on PowerPoint. Susan
emphasized how to best handle texts, graphics, and footers,
as well as the need to stick to 32-point font if possible.
She prefers Arial fonts, as Serifs can be
distracting. The major emphasis of the
talk after this brief introduction was to show ways around
some stumbling blocks in PowerPoint.
This generated lively discussion with many additional
suggestions from the scholars themselves.
As is
our tradition, a working lunch was used to review issues
in career development. Topics
included understanding more about steps needed for
promotion; the meaning of tenure; aspects of writing
data-oriented papers; the importance of selecting committees
on which to work; time management; how to say
Ano@
when requested to do something that isn=t
in your best interest; assets and liabilities of switching
one=s
own career focus; how to take some educational materials and
turn them into scholarly papers that can give credit for
promotion; and a networking-like discussion regarding ways
of generating additional monies for research in education.
The last
official function on Thursday was Andrea DiMartini=s
presentation of her lecture on assessing alcohol use
problems. This was an excellent and
comprehensive lecture that was extremely well received.
A number of suggestions were made for clarification
of a few of the major points, and additional comments
focused on how to make an excellent delivery style even more
effective.
The
meeting adjourned at 2:30 p.m. after a brief discussion
of the agenda for the next day.
III.
Friday, April 2nd.
Our
group reconvened at 8:00 a.m. The first
item on our agenda was the presentation by Dr. Joseph
Sakai of his lecture on opioid substitution therapies (e.g.,
methadone maintenance). This was a
clear, well delivered, and effective lecture.
The material raised a number of questions from the
audience (primarily reflecting how interesting the lecture
itself was), along with some suggestions for reaching an
even higher level of effectiveness.
Chris
Delos Reyes, a senior scholar, next presented her
accomplishments at Case Western Reserve Medical School.
Despite
a two-month maternity leave, she has impressive
accomplishments. In the last six months
she gave two lectures to the second-year medical students
regarding Substance Use Disorders during the psychiatry
didactic series, one of which was her own AMSP lecture, and
the other one was on screening and assessment. She also gave
an elective lecture on Physician Impairment and Recovery
during the lunch hour, using an adaptation of the AMSP
lecture on this topic. Chris is working
to get this into the regular curriculum, as was suggested by
a student.
She
continues to direct didactics on substance use disorders to
the PGY-1 psychiatry residents (4 lectures) and the PGY-3
psychiatry residents (8 lectures). For the first time, she
was also asked to direct didactics for PGY-4 psychiatry
residents regarding treatment of patients with dual
diagnosis (3 lectures). As the director of the addiction
psychiatry fellowship, she has assisted in recruiting four
fellows for the next academic year with whom she meets on a
weekly basis. Four fellows is a huge
number!
She
participated as a lecturer in a two-day training for primary
care physicians on buprenorphine in December 2003, and gave
three lectures: one on screening for substance use
disorders, one on assessment of substance use disorders, and
one on co-morbid psychiatric disorders in opiate-dependent
persons. This is one of the few such
programs to use this forum to teach about substance use
disorders.
Short-term projects include mentoring a PGY-4 resident who
is presenting grand rounds on physician impairment,
presenting a talk on psychopharmacology in dual diagnosis at
a statewide physician=s
conference, and developing a day-long addiction psychiatry
seminar at a statewide dual diagnosis conference. In terms
of long-term goals, Chris hopes to establish a month-long
addiction rotation for all psychiatric residents, to
collaborate with faculty members on a buprenorphine clinic,
to continue to refine the didactics courses on substance use
disorders, and to develop a comprehensive system for
identifying and treating medical students with alcohol and
drug use disorders.
At this
point, Gail Rose, a senior scholar, was asked to modify
her original 45-minute lecture into a 30-minute
presentation, but this time aimed at new faculty (the topic
of the lecture was How to be An Effective Mentor).
Her presentation was structured to demonstrate to the
first-year scholars that a lecture developed in one time
frame for a specific audience can fairly easily be modified
to another time frame and another audience.
Gail did so well, that after the first ten minutes
she was asked to assume that their had been an emergency;
ten minutes had been cut from her lecture; and she would
need to proceed with a 20-minute lecture to the same
audience. Gail demonstrated how this can
be done if the written outline is effective (so she could
briefly skim to find out what to skip over and what to
emphasize), and if she could keep her three or four major
points in mind. She did a wonderful job,
and was able to show everyone at the meeting how these types
of crises that can easily develop during a class or lecture
can be handled and survived.
Katie
McQueen of Baylor College of Medicine then presented her
report of accomplishments as a senior scholar.
She remains on the Internal Medicine (IM) Core
Curriculum Committee and the Resident Ambulatory Curriculum
Committee. As creator of the exam for
students in Internal Medicine, there is always SUD content.
She teaches all IM students for one hour on Screening
and Brief Intervention and one hour on Intoxication and
Withdrawal. She also teaches in the residency program.
Katie is working with the Addiction Scholars Program
at Baylor College of Medicine (which was in part patterned
after AMSP) to create a longitudinal curriculum for medical
students. She was a consultant and is
now Medical Director for the Harris County Hospital District
Screening, Brief Intervention, Referral, and Treatment
Program. This program involves training
physicians and nurses in screening for alcohol and drug
problems and providing prevention and intervention services
for patients at the large county hospital, four community
clinics, and three school based clinics.
She also does several CME lectures on a local, regional, and
two national related to SUDs. Her
Mentored Clinical Investigator Award is continuing, and she
will revise and resubmit her K23 application that was not
funded. AMSP has been very important in
educational and service delivery, development and delivery.
Karen
Drexler, the senior scholar from Emory University, then
presented a variation of her lecture on the Neuroimaging of
Craving. Her goal was to modify an
already effective lecture that might be optimally
appropriate for research graduate students, to make it a bit
easier for a medical student audience to follow.
This is a very challenging task, and Karen encouraged
the group to interrupt her with suggestions, especially as
they might recognize the types of problems they would face
with their own data or research areas.
This was a very useful exercise with many suggestions that
resulted in further modification of this fine presentation.
The revised lecture is to be incorporated on the
website.
Sarah
Book, from the Medical University of South Carolina, next
presented her accomplishments and future plans.
As a direct result of her involvement in AMSP, she
has become a medical student lecturer on
AThe Diagnosis and
Treatment of Alcoholism@.
Also, as a result of her participation in AMSP, Sarah
is incorporating her interest in alcoholism education into
several of her other roles at MUSC. For
example, she has used her position on the Medical Student
Selection Committee to discuss the importance of addiction
related issues to interviewing medical students.
She has taken on a similar role on the Psychiatry
Resident Selection Committee when she meets with residency
applicants. In this way, Dr. Book is
actively recruiting students and residents with an interest
in addiction-related issues. Also, Sarah
is using her position on the Medical Student Education
Committee to insure that addiction-related topics are an
important priority when educating medical students in her
department.
With
AMSP, she has been developing a lecture on the comorbidity
of Social Anxiety and Alcohol Use and she recently delivered
the lecture to a group of community clinicians, at her
university=s
ADay of Discovery.@
This was a great opportunity to expose the public to
issues related to alcohol use disorders.
In addition, during her introduction, her division director,
Dr. Raymond Anton, mentioned the importance of AMSP and of
how valuable it is for both Dr. Book and the department, and
the University as a whole to have a connection to AMSP under
the guidance of Dr. Schuckit. This was
indeed great exposure for AMSP.
Dr. Book is also a mentor each year
to a third year medical student with an interest in pursuing
a career in psychiatry. Through her involvement in AMSP, Dr
Book is exposing her mentee to the importance of addiction
psychiatry. In addition, Sarah has
learned invaluable tools from AMSP on the topic of mentoring
that will make her a more effective and successful mentor.
Finally,
Dr. Book has developed a poster presentation about AMSP that
she will be presenting at the Annual Meeting of the Research
Society on Alcoholism in June 2004 in Vancouver, BC.
There she and other scholars will
provide information about AMSP to highlight its usefulness
and increase its exposure in the scientific community, as
well as to recruit potential new scholars.
In the
next six months, Dr. Book will be working on developing a
medical student elective on addictions.
She plans on using Dr. Tapert=s
curriculum posted on the AMSP website.
Also, by networking with Dr. Delos Reyes at the AMSP meeting
in Del Mar, Sarah learned about a CME program for primary
care physicians on addiction to incorporate into
buprenorphine training. She will look
into the possibility of putting on one of these sessions.
The last
presentation of the morning was Andrea DiMartini=s
demonstration of how to insert video in PowerPoint.
This is a challenging process (which she has mastered
well), and Andrea was able to give many useful points to the
scholars.
The
working lunch focused on additional issues important to
thriving in an academic medical school environment.
These included more details regarding writing papers
(when to, when not to, and how), as well as an extended
discussion of time management. The group
also touched on how to identify specific requests by other
faculty members that should be honored, and those where one
can respectfully bow out.
Following lunch, Sarah Book reviewed some of the
activities going on at the Research Society on Alcoholism
meeting in Vancouver, British Columbia in June.
Sarah took on the task of creating a poster for the
RSA meeting, and this was accepted by the Research Society
and scheduled for a presentation on the Wednesday of the
meeting at 1:00 p.m. Sarah will (with
Marcy=s
help) ask graduate scholars if they will be willing to help
Aperson - or man@
the booth. We discussed the importance
of having computers available to demonstrate the website, as
well as handouts. This also raised the
issue of a breakfast at RSA on Wednesday where
scholars can get together and discuss how the meeting is
going for them. This will include all
graduate scholars, and Marcy will send a note to all
graduates, as well as current scholars, reminding any of
them attending the meeting about when (7:30 a.m. in all
likelihood) and where (the luncheon room food line) to meet.
Marianne Fireman of the University of Oregon next presented
her lecture on alcoholism and hepatitis C.
This was also well organized, had very effective
slides, and had a unique benefit of teaching the members of
AMSP about a topic on which they are not yet expert.
A number of suggestions were made regarding ways of
building in some rest periods; altering a few slides;
cutting back on the number of slides used; and so on.
Everyone agreed that this was a well-organized and
highly effective lecture.
The
group adjourned at 2:30 p.m. on Friday, after reviewing
plans for a working dinner that evening, as well as the
agenda for Saturday morning.
IV.
A working dinner was held at a local restaurant
(Il Fornio) on the evening of Friday, April 2nd.
The group met in the lobby at 7:15 to walk to the
restaurant, and a most enjoyable (and productive) evening
was experienced by all. We were
especially fortunate that Gregory McQueen was available to
help us settle down with some remarkable fiddle music.
Gregory was appointed as an adjunct scholar for all
of the efforts he has made on our behalf over the prior two
years.
V.
Saturday, April 3rd.
We began
with a demonstration by a senior scholar, Chris Delos
Reyes of a 20-minute paired down version of her lecture on
substance use disorders; does it work?
She limited herself to approximately five slides with
three or four major points. Once again,
this is a challenging task, performed very well by Chris.
A number of suggestions were made regarding creation
of some new slides (rather than using slides already
developed for the longer presentation, as had been initially
assigned), and Chris immediately reworked her slides to
demonstrate how effective the alterations were likely to be.
The
meeting continued with a 30-minute new lecture by, senior
scholar, Dr. Katie McQueen who demonstrated material that
she has developed regarding prescription drug misuse as it
might be delivered to resident physicians.
As is true of everything Katie has developed for AMSP,
this was focused, extremely well organized, highly
effective, with excellent slides. There
were a few suggestions about areas that might be clarified a
bit, but we all encouraged Dr. McQueen to take this
excellent lecture and make it available on the AMSP website
if at all possible.
Karen
Drexler, a senior scholar, then presented a wonderfully
creative and very effective lecture on the use of Endnotes.
Many practical suggestions were made, and Karen had
some interesting and effective ways of simulating attachment
to a website. The group asked Karen to
consider developing a form of this lecture on Endnotes to be
incorporated in the educational approaches subsection of the
AMSP website.
Marc
then led a discussion on AMSP recruitment and evaluation.
He reminded the group of the importance of selecting
individuals who are relatively early in their careers but
who are likely to stay in a medical school setting for many
years to come. Several candidates for
next year were discussed, and Marc will close recruitment
within approximately the next week.
The
group then turned to a discussion of the next meeting
dates and site. After a series of
possibilities were discussed, the group agreed that we
will reconvene on Wednesday, October 20th.
The meeting site will probably be in California
(perhaps Laguna Beach or San Francisco).
Depending upon the strength of the dollar (all meetings must
be kept within a similar range of costs no matter where they
are held), we will also look into the possibility of a
meeting at an easy to get to site in Mexico; a possible
meeting in New York; and the possibility of returning to
Hawaii.
A
related topic was the timing for the next conference call.
The date selected was Wednesday, July 7th
at noon San Diego time (3:00 p.m. East Coast time).
Marcy will work with a new
group to organize the conference call.
Marcy
and Susan then led a discussion of the Web site.
Briefly, there were approximately 14,000 hits per
month, with as many as 6000 individual visits per month.
In a 30-day period, approximately 4500 individuals
downloaded material from our website, with interest
appearing to be widespread across our lectures, including
about 10% who requested the athletics lecture; 8% the
lecture on personality; and 5% medical consequences.
Our visitors came from six continents including
approximately 10% from Europe and 6% from Asia.
About 40% of the visitors reached the AMSP website
through Google, and 10% through Yahoo, indicating that they
were seeking out our website because of some personal or
professional problem. Other sources
include 5% who directly sought out our website, and 4% who
found us through Operation Cork.
Karen
Drexler, a senior scholar, then presented her
accomplishments and future goals at Emory University in
Atlanta, Georgia. Since the last meeting, Dr. Drexler
has served as Chair for a Lunch and Learn panel discussion
for second-year medical students entitled
ALegalization of
Marijuana: Legitimate Medical Treatment or Just Blowing
Smoke?@
Karen was appointed Co-Chair of the PGY-5 committee
of the American Academy of Addiction Psychiatry.
She has been appointed as a member of the Physician
Impairment Subcommittee of the Emory University Faculty and
Staff Assistance Program Advisory Board.
She lectured to Atlanta VA primary care providers (Emory
Internal Medicine Faculty and VA Staff members) on
Evidence-Based Treatment of Substance Use Disorders in
Primary Care. She submitted a proposal
for a VA Clinical Merit Review research project examining
topiramate for treatment of nicotine craving.
Dr. Drexler continues ongoing teaching activities, which
include directing one five-week block of the Human Behavior
Course for second-year medical students on Substance Use
Disorders. She continues as Director of
Addiction Psychiatry Residency Training at Emory, continues
to direct 12 hours of didactics on Substance Use Disorders
for Emory general psychiatry residents, and provides another
three hours of lectures on the comorbidity between substance
use disorders and anxiety and mood disorders.
Karen remains the Director of Substance Abuse
Treatment Programs at the Atlanta VAMC.
She is in the 4th year of her Career Development
Award on neuroimaging of emotion regulation in cocaine
dependence, and collaborates on several experiments in
neuroimaging and addiction. She is a
member of the Board of Directors for Metro Atlanta Recovery
Residences, a non-profit substance use disorder treatment
program, and also serves as a member of the Addiction
Psychiatry Certification Examination Committee of the
American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology.
Next,
Marianne Fireman from the University of Oregon reviewed her
accomplishments and future plans. Marian Fireman of
Oregon Health and Science University (OHSU) reviewed her
accomplishments over the last six months and her plans for
the next six months. The LCME recently
completed a site visit at OHSU and as Clerkship Director for
Psychiatry, Marian submitted material for the self-study
process and met with several of the site visitors.
The site visit went well and a positive report is
anticipated. In addition, the psychiatry
clerkship is currently undergoing review (a process that
occurs every three years) and she will meet with the
Curriculum Committee regarding the clerkship next month.
She has met with two of the assistant Deans for
medical student education and will have the opportunity to
review the content of curricula for the first- and
second-year courses with regard to teaching of substance use
disorders in the near future.
She will be reviewing, revamping and adding several lectures
on addiction psychiatry to the 3rd year
clerkship, and Marian hopes to collaborate with several
other faculty on a half-day course on addictions also taught
during the 3rd year of medical school
B this course will be
in March or May 2005. Because of changes
in the structure of the 3rd and 4th
year curricula, an opportunity may exist to add a required
rotation in substance use disorders to the 4th
year
B this change will not
occur until July 2005, but planning will occur during the
next year. Marian currently meets with
two to three 3rd-year medical students
approximately twice per month on an informal basis for
discussion of patient interviewing, diagnosis, pharmacology
and management. She continues to be a
member of the Clinical Services Subcommittee of the School
of Medicine Curriculum Committee.
With regard to resident teaching, Marian is currently
Director of the PGY-2 and 3 course in addiction psychiatry;
she has requested that this course be expanded to six months
(instead of three months)
B it is taught every
other year. In addition, she has met
with the Director of Residency Training.
It has been recommended to the Department Chair that she be
appointed to the Residency Training Committee and to a
subcommittee that will consider changes to the residency
curriculum
B including additional
time for didactics in addiction psychiatry and restructuring
of the 3rd-year clinical rotation in addiction
psychiatry. Dr. Fireman continues to
lecture to incoming residents on intoxication and withdrawal
syndromes, on various subjects in the addiction psychiatry
curriculum and on neurobiology of withdrawal syndromes in
the neuroscience curriculum. She
currently supervises a 2nd-year resident in the
outpatient clinic, a 3rd-year resident in the
Hepatitis C Clinic, spends one morning per week with the
consultation-liaison resident in the Liver Transplant
Clinic, and had the opportunity to interview 10-15 residency
applicants this year.
With
regard to fellowship training, Marian will likely be
appointed Associate Director of the Addiction Psychiatry
Fellowship within the next few months, which will give her
an expanded teaching and administrative role.
Also, starting in July 2004 she will be supervising
geriatric psychiatry fellows in the Geriatric Substance Use
Disorders Clinic. She plans to continue
to meet with the Director of Residency Training, the
Department Chair, the Deans for Undergraduate Medical
Education and the Dean for Graduate Medical Education, as
necessary, accomplish the above activities, and identify
areas in need of improvement with regard to teaching of
substance use disorders.
Marian
has also been appointed to be one of two representatives of
the Oregon Psychiatric Association who meet quarterly with
the Director and Medical Director of the Oregon Board of
Medical Examiners to discuss issues of Physician Wellness.
Andrea DiMartini of the University of Pittsburgh next
reviewed her accomplishments and future goals.
Over the last six months, Dr. DiMartini has
instituted a
AHow to Give a Lecture@
series for the fourth-year psychiatry residents and fellows.
The first two weeks of the seminar she gave Marc
Schuckit=s
PowerPoint lecture on
AHow To Give A Lecture@
and Susan Tapert=s
lecture on
APowerPoint@.
With that foundation she is meeting with the
residents weekly and the group is working on developing
their outlines and PowerPoint slides for their upcoming
Grand Rounds presentations. She is also doing practice
sessions with residents so they can rehearse their
presentations in the auditorium prior to their actual
presentations. Dr. DiMartini has been
asked to make this a regular part of the residency training
didactics.
Andrea
developed and presented a two-hour seminar to the
Psychiatric Epidemiology graduate students on the
epidemiology and diagnoses of substance use disorders.
The second part of her talk dealt with methodological
aspects of substance use disorders research.
She
mentored a medical student who participated on her research
project. This student met with her
several times a week to discuss diagnostic,
recruitment/retention, data collection, and data analysis
issues. The student assisted in the
collection and analysis of research data.
Andrea helped the student to design a poster
presentation on the data and attended the poster session
with the student. They plan to write a
paper on this project.
During
the fall semester Andrea was the preceptor for a Masters
graduate student=s
research practicum. This student was
interested in addiction research and participated in all
aspects of research supervised by Dr. DiMartini from
recruiting participants, to collecting and entering data, to
assisting with the analysis of the data.
Andrea also gave the student a tutorial on how to give a
lecture and how to make a PowerPoint presentation, and
assisted the student in designing and rehearsing her
presentation.
Dr.
DiMartini has offered and is now giving as a standard
lecture to the consultation-liaison psychiatry residents a
lecture on the assessment of organ transplant patients.
This lecture includes a significant component of
substance use/abuse assessment and treatment referral.
This will become a standard lecture to the residents.
She
attended the Medical School Curriculum Committee meeting and
is joining one of the Medical School Curriculum committees
to develop further integration of alcohol and substance use
disorders education into the first-year medical student
curriculum.
For the
next six months Andrea plans to survey the full Medical
School curriculum to see which areas could be improved with
respect to substance use disorders teaching.
She will also explore options for increasing
substance use disorder education into the clinical
rotations. She is also considering
hosting an Alcohol Screening day to provide medical students
an opportunity to be educated on and practice screening for
alcohol use problems. This activity
would combine nicely with her presentation on screening for
alcohol use and alcohol problems.
The
assistant AMSP Director, Marianne Guschwan, next presented
some of her observations and accomplishments at New York
University. Marianne reviewed some of the activities at
New York University that she started during her tenure as an
AMSP scholar, including starting a rotation for medical
students on the detoxification unit and a club for medical
students based on interest in substance use disorders.
Marianne continues to supervise a third-year
psychiatry resident and an addiction fellow.
She teaches a four-session course on how to prepare
and give a lecture to addiction fellows who teach the
medical students, as well as to give two lectures yearly to
neurology residents on substance use disorders.
Marianne
has become more active within the Department of Psychiatry
Residency Training Program serving as a member of the
Psychiatry Residency Selection Committee and the Third and
Fourth Year Committee. She recently was
selected to work within the Residency Training Office to
provide mentorship and guidance to residents interested in
research. She is supervising a resident
who will be shadowing her work as the study physician on
medication trials targeted toward substance use disorders as
well as attention deficit disorder in adults.
Outside
of NYU, Marianne was able to utilize the lecture on
spirituality and 12-step groups developed for AMSP at an
educational program organized by Hazelden-New York, a
rehabilitation program. The lecture was
given to PGY2 internal medicine residents from Columbia
University who were attending a one-day seminar on
alcoholism. In addition, she continues
to recruit for AMSP through her activities with the American
Psychiatric Association. During the past
year, she was asked to serve on the board of a
rehabilitation program based on the therapeutic community
model, Odyssey House, located in New York.
Skills gained from AMSP have helped her in presenting
data to non-physician members of the board.
Next,
the second Assistant Director, Susan Tapert, reviewed some
of the ongoing activities at UCSD.
Susan Tapert described the ongoing
and recent activities at UCSD that have been initiated or
made possible due to her affiliation with AMSP.
She continues with Marc Schuckit to teach an elective
course to medical students on
AClinical
Aspects of Alcohol and Drug Use Disorders.@
Nine students are enrolled. She continues to serve as
consultant to the Doctors Ought to Care (DOC) Alcohol
program in the UCSD Medical School. Susan also mentors 1-2
medical students each summer on alcohol-related research
projects. At the residency level of training, Susan
supervises a PGY III student on relapse prevention and
cognitive behavior therapy. At the fellow level, she
provides an annual in-service
to the PGY II and child psychiatry
fellows rotating on the UCSD Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
Service on assessing alcohol and drug problems in youth and
on how to prepare and deliver lectures.
Dr. Tapert is also involved with
imparting clinically relevant alcohol and drug material to
psychology trainees. She mentors 5-6 psychology
undergraduate students each quarter, and lectures in
psychology and cognitive science courses on fetal alcohol
syndrome, injection drug use, and the neurocognitive effects
of alcohol and drug use on adolescents. Her two graduate
students and postdoctoral research fellow have been trained
to deliver these lectures. Dr. Tapert continues to annually
deliver a lecture on the psychiatric and neuropsychological
sequelae of alcohol and drugs to clinical psychology
interns. In addition, Dr. Tapert highlighted that her AMSP
participation has improved her lecturing abilities, which
has served to broader her speaking opportunities and thus
advance her career as a research psychologist.
The
meeting ended with a brief review of additional
housekeeping topics, as well as announcements.
We officially adjourned at noon, with good wishes to
everyone for a safe and swift trip home.
All scholars (junior and senior) were reminded of the July 7th
conference call, and the junior scholars were reminded that
our next face-to-face get-together will begin at 5:00 p.m.
on October 20th.
Marc A.
Schuckit, M.D.